About Probiotics

A course study published in 2009 in the prestigious scientific journal Nature, which at the end turned out to be only a newspaper publisher written by the French biologist Didier Raoult, stated that there was a direct relationship between the intake of probiotics and childhood obesity.

It is now in 2012, three years later, when jumping to the light of public opinion this article without a scientific basis in spite of who writes it, after the decision of the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) to bind to change the statements about the health effects of products on the basis of probiotics type Actimel or Activia.

This decision of the EFSA is due to the legal limitation, I repeat legal, to give only the action for the benefit of the health and recovery from the illness, exclusively to the medication.

***************************************************
For Auto Glass Repair, Door Glass Repair, and Back Window Replacement in the Bay Area and in the city of Concord, call the best company ... call Duran's Auto Glass.

***************************************************


The same laws that prevent the nutritional supplements and give an account on the proven benefit in health, since it is not drugs, are to the that is also bound the great food industry, which because of their strength media have ignored the legal limitations put to other nutritional supplements with much greater capacity and efficiency proven scientific.

This is the real reason, of wars between industries covered by laws designed not for the benefit and protection to the consumer as it is intended to make view, but to serve the interests of pharmaceutical companies.

The alarm the creates Roault to affirm that the bacteria used in probiotic products these are the same as used in industrial farming as growth promoters to fatten up more quickly to pigs and chickens, but as a scientist you lie more data of rigor and multitude of studies confirming the excellent health benefits of probiotics and prebiotics.

In response to the article, not study, Roault, and in the same journal Nature, the scientific Dusko Ehrlich brought order to these absurdities perhaps with some interest, although this has not been picked up by the press. Ehrlich argues that Raoult has not examined properly the scientific evidence, that has over-interpreting the studies cited, that has been omitted other jobs in the same quality, and has used a faulty logic in regard to the strains of microorganisms involved.

Also, they should also have the same weight, the comments made by Nathalie Delzenne and Gregor Reid, whom have signed another commentary that argues that the weight gain observed in the cattle after the administration of probiotics responds to an increase in your lean body mass due to the improvement to the resistance to infections (and therefore to a reduced amount of diarrhea), and never the increased fat mass by the metabolic imbalance that causes obesity.

Let us bear in mind that the antibiotics that we take by prescription and those that are found in the meat treated with this medication destroy intestinal flora own. Many serious illnesses, such as Crohn's disease and other digestive not only, but if immune of nature, have been resolved through the repopulation of intestinal flora with strains of probiotic from different sources, not just those that are found in yogurts whose proportion to its effectiveness if it can be questioned. The repopulation of intestinal flora is a reality with the use of other medications to which the medical profession does not end to recognize.

The objective of use of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics (sum of both) in animals for human food is to improve your intestinal health, reduce the incidence of diseases by reducing or eliminating even the use of antibiotics, and increase the efficiency of absorption of some minerals and vitamins.